Evidence Based Practice Psychology: A Guide for Australian Practitioners

It’s the end of a long day of back-to-back clients. You’re trying to write up your notes, and that familiar, low-level dread kicks in. Does a file note saying you "built rapport and explored themes" suddenly feel a bit thin? When you think about a potential AHPRA audit, does a flicker of doubt creep in about whether your clinical reasoning is clear enough on the page?

You’ve spent years honing your clinical intuition. It's the bedrock of your practice. But how do you balance the 'art' of therapy with the 'science' that the Psychology Board of Australia (PsyBA) expects?

This friction is something many seasoned practitioners feel. You hear the term "evidence-based practice," and it can land like yet another bureaucratic hoop to jump through—one that almost feels like it’s questioning the very judgment you’ve worked so hard to build.

The good news? Evidence-based practice, or EBP, isn't here to cancel out your experience. In fact, its real purpose is to formalise, validate, and strengthen the excellent clinical work you are already doing.

Is Your Clinical Judgment Enough for AHPRA?

Let's reframe this. The best way to think about EBP is not as a rigid script, but as a three-legged stool. For that stool to be stable and supportive, all three legs must be present and strong:

• Best Available Research Evidence: What does the formal body of knowledge tell us about this particular presentation or problem?
• Your Clinical Expertise: How does your professional judgment, experience, and skill inform how you apply that evidence to this specific person sitting in front of you?
• Client Values and Context: What are the client’s unique goals, cultural background, personal preferences, and life circumstances?

Notice that middle leg? Your clinical expertise is a non-negotiable part of the EBP model. The PsyBA's own professional practice standards require psychologists to apply "knowledge of the evidence base for the psychological services they provide." This doesn’t mean you have to discard your intuition; it just means you need to be able to explain how your intuition is informed by the other two legs of the stool.

By integrating these three components, you shift from simply stating your clinical judgment to demonstrating your clinical reasoning. This is a crucial distinction when it comes to meeting professional standards and feeling truly confident in your work. You can learn more about how this fits into broader compliance in our guide to AHPRA psychology registration requirements.

Ultimately, EBP offers a defensible framework that validates your skills. It gives you a clear language to explain why you made a certain clinical choice, turning your notes from a simple record of events into a robust justification of your professional practice. It’s not about adding another tedious task to your plate; it’s about making the great work you already do more transparent and audit-ready.

The Three Pillars of Evidence-Based Practice

So, what does evidence-based practice actually look like on the ground? It's not just about reading research papers. Effective EBP in psychology rests on three equally important components. The best analogy is a stable, three-legged stool—if one leg is weak or missing, the entire structure becomes wobbly and unreliable.

Each leg represents a core element that, when properly integrated, leads to defensible and genuinely client-centred care. This balanced approach ensures your clinical decisions are well-rounded, considering the broad scientific landscape, your own professional wisdom, and the unique individual sitting across from you.

This simple model shows how the three pillars of research, clinical expertise, and client values are interconnected, forming the foundation of modern EBP.

As you can see, no single pillar can stand alone. True EBP happens in the space where they overlap.

Pillar 1: The Best Available Research Evidence

This is the pillar that gets the most airtime, and for good reason. It refers to clinically relevant research, especially from patient-centred clinical studies. But here’s a crucial point: “best available” doesn’t mean you have to find a perfect randomised controlled trial (RCT) that exactly matches every client’s unique situation. That would be impossible.

Instead, it’s about understanding the hierarchy of evidence. A systematic review or meta-analysis, which synthesises findings from multiple high-quality studies, sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. These are gold because they do a lot of the heavy lifting for you, summarising the state of the evidence on a particular topic. Below that, you have individual studies like RCTs, followed by other research designs.

The goal isn't to turn you into a full-time academic. It’s about developing the skill of efficiently finding and appraising the most trustworthy evidence applicable to your client’s presenting problem.

Pillar 2: Your Clinical Expertise

This is where you come in. All your years of training, supervised practice, and direct client work are condensed into this pillar. Your clinical expertise is the indispensable filter through which you view both the research and the client. It’s what allows you to accurately identify a client’s unique state, diagnosis, and personal circumstances.

Your expertise is your ability to take a general principle from a research paper and skilfully adapt it to the real, complex human being in your office. It allows you to assess the client, arrive at a formulation, and consider all the individual and cultural factors that a research study simply can't account for. It’s not an alternative to research; it’s the vital component that makes the research usable.

Pillar 3: Client Values, Preferences, and Context

The final, crucial pillar is the client themselves. This is about honouring their unique preferences, goals, cultural background, spiritual beliefs, and personal values. Truly client-centred care means ditching the "expert-on-high" role and engaging in shared decision-making.

It's about having conversations that sound like this: "Okay, based on what we've talked about, the evidence suggests a couple of approaches could be really effective here. Let’s talk through what each one involves and see which feels like a better fit for you and your goals right now."

This collaborative stance respects the client’s autonomy and is absolutely essential for building a strong therapeutic alliance.

---

Bringing these three pillars together in your daily practice is the essence of EBP. The following table breaks down what each pillar means in practical terms and gives you some reflective questions to ask yourself.

The Three Pillars of EBP in Practice

Pillar	What It Means	Questions to Ask in Your Practice
Best Available Research Evidence	Staying current with high-quality, clinically relevant research syntheses and studies.	What does the current evidence say about this presentation? Where can I find a reliable summary (e.g., systematic review)? How strong is this evidence?
Your Clinical Expertise	Using your professional judgment, skills, and past experience to interpret data and apply it to a specific client.	What is my assessment and formulation of this client's situation? How do their unique circumstances affect which interventions might work? Have I seen a similar presentation before, and what was effective then?
Client Values & Preferences	Collaborating with the client to understand their goals, cultural context, and what they want from therapy.	What are the client's goals for therapy, in their own words? What are their values and preferences regarding treatment? Have we discussed the pros and cons of different options together?

Thinking through these questions for each client is a powerful way to ensure you're not just following a script, but providing truly integrated, evidence-based care.

Unfortunately, there can be a gap between knowing this model and actually applying it. A recent Australian study revealed that while most practitioners have positive attitudes towards EBP, only 60% could accurately define it. More worryingly, some with more years of experience held more negative views.

You can read the full study on psychologist attitudes towards EBP in Australia for more detail. Understanding and consciously integrating all three pillars is the first step to closing this gap, moving beyond a "cookbook" approach to a tailored, defensible, and genuinely collaborative treatment plan. That's what masterful practice is all about.

Finding High-Quality Research Without Losing Hours

Let's be honest. The idea of trawling through research databases between client sessions feels almost impossible. Your caseload is full, the admin is piling up, and the 'research' pillar of EBP can feel like a completely unrealistic demand on your time.

But here’s the good news: the goal isn't to read every new paper that gets published. It's about developing a smart, efficient, 'just-in-time' search strategy that gets you the best possible evidence right when you need it, without sacrificing hours you don't have.

Start with Synthesised Evidence

Instead of starting every search from scratch, begin with resources that have already done the heavy lifting for you. Your most valuable assets here are clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews.

• Clinical Practice Guidelines: These are developed by professional bodies like the APS. They evaluate and summarise the evidence for specific conditions, giving you clear recommendations for assessment and treatment based on a rigorous review process.
• Systematic Reviews: These papers collect and critically analyse multiple research studies on a single question. They provide a high-level overview of the current state of the evidence, saving you from having to piece it together yourself.

Think of these resources as the expert summary you wish you had time to create. They condense years of research into a single, digestible document, making them the most efficient starting point for any clinical query.

Your Go-To Australian and International Resources

For psychologists in Australia, there are a few key places to find high-quality, synthesised evidence quickly. It pays to start with these before diving into the vastness of broader databases.

• Australian Psychological Society (APS) Guidelines: The APS publishes excellent evidence-based guidelines on a range of topics highly relevant to Australian practice. They're a fantastic, context-specific first stop.
• The Cochrane Library: Globally recognised as a top-tier resource, the Cochrane Library is a massive database of systematic reviews. Its plain language summaries are particularly useful for quickly grasping the key findings.
• PsycINFO: This is a comprehensive database of all psychology literature. The trick is to use its filters to specifically search for "systematic review" or "meta-analysis." This simple step narrows your focus to synthesised evidence and saves a huge amount of time.

By bookmarking these resources and getting comfortable with their search filters, you can slash your search time dramatically. This also ties directly into your professional development; time spent on this kind of targeted research can often be logged as part of your CPD requirements.

The Power of Local Research

It’s also worth remembering the strength of our own research community here in Australia. Our contribution to psychology research has grown significantly, now accounting for 5.8% of all psychology articles published globally.

When you adjust for population, Australia's research productivity in psychology actually outperforms North America and Britain. This is especially true for applied and clinical psychology, where our local researchers are making a massive global contribution. Impressively, this growth in quantity hasn't come at the expense of quality, with a high proportion of Australian research appearing in top-tier journals. You can find a deeper analysis of Australia's contribution to evidence-based practice research here.

What this means for you is that locally produced research and guidelines are not just convenient—they are world-class and highly relevant to the clients you see every day. Prioritising Australian sources ensures your practice is informed by evidence generated within our unique healthcare and cultural context.

This focused approach transforms the research pillar from a daunting academic exercise into a manageable clinical tool. It’s about being strategic—knowing where to look first to find reliable answers that you can apply directly to your caseload.

With the right strategy, staying current with evidence-based practice in psychology becomes an achievable part of your professional routine, not a distraction from it. This targeted approach to learning is also a core part of effective CPD, which you can explore further in our guide to CPD requirements from AHPRA.

Integrating Client Values and Preferences in Practice

You’ve sifted through the research and drawn on your own clinical wisdom. Now comes the most delicate—and arguably most crucial—part of evidence-based practice: weaving it all together with the living, breathing human sitting across from you.

This is the third pillar: client values, preferences, and context.

This isn't about ticking a box with a token question during intake. It's a dynamic, ongoing conversation that genuinely positions the client as a partner in their own care. It’s an acknowledgement that they are the foremost expert on their own life, culture, and what they ultimately want to achieve.

Getting this right is what transforms a technically sound intervention into a truly therapeutic one. It’s the difference between a client who passively goes through the motions and one who is actively engaged and deeply invested in their own progress.

The Art of Shared Decision-Making

Shared decision-making is the heart of this pillar. It means moving beyond simply informing the client about a treatment plan and, instead, creating it with them.

This process involves laying out the evidence-based options, clearly explaining the "why" behind them in everyday language, and then genuinely making space for the client's perspective.

For example, you might say something like:

"Based on the research for the kind of anxiety you're describing, an approach called exposure therapy tends to be very effective. It involves gradually and safely facing the situations you fear. Another option, which also has good evidence, focuses more on understanding the thoughts driving the anxiety. They feel quite different to do. How do those two possibilities land with you as we think about a starting point?"

That simple conversational shift completely changes the dynamic. It respects the client's autonomy and sends a clear message: their comfort and opinion are a critical part of the equation.

A Real-World Scenario: Complementary Medicine

A common test of this principle arises when a client’s preferences lean towards treatments outside of conventional psychology, like complementary medicine (CM). A client might ask, "My friend suggested I see a naturopath for my low mood. What do you think?"

Ignoring or shutting down this question is a fast way to damage the therapeutic relationship. A true EBP approach means meeting this with curiosity and openness, while still holding firm to your professional and ethical responsibilities.

This isn’t some niche issue; it’s a daily reality in Australian practice. A landmark 2023 study revealed that 90.5% of Australian psychologists recommend CM practices to clients, and an incredible 95.5% actively ask clients about their CM use. This shows just how mainstream these conversations have become. You can explore the full findings on CM integration in Australian psychology to see how deeply embedded this is in modern practice.

So, how do you handle it in an EBP-aligned way? The conversation might look like this:

• Validate their proactive stance: "It's great that you're exploring different ways to get support. It really shows how committed you are to feeling better."
• Gather more information: "Can you tell me a bit more about what you're hoping the naturopath might be able to help with?"
• Provide balanced, expert information: "My expertise is in psychological therapies, which have a strong evidence base for improving mood. While I can't advise on naturopathy specifically, we can definitely talk about how any different approaches you decide to take can work together safely and effectively."

This approach honours the client's preference without you having to abandon your own evidence base. You maintain your role as the psychological expert while respecting their right to make informed choices about their overall health. What could be a point of conflict becomes a collaborative discussion.

Documenting EBP for Supervision and Audits

It’s one thing to understand the three pillars of evidence-based practice. It’s another thing entirely to prove you’re using them when your supervisor reviews your logbook or an AHPRA audit notice lands in your inbox. This is where theory gets real, fast.

The thought of an audit can stir a low-level dread in even the most competent clinician. You know you’re doing good work, but have you written your notes in a way that shows it? A hurried scribble at the end of a long day might feel sufficient in the moment, but it can look alarmingly thin under official scrutiny.

The secret to defensible documentation isn’t about writing more; it’s about writing with more clarity. It’s about making your clinical reasoning visible. The Psychology Board of Australia (PsyBA) guidelines are clear: our records must be "sufficient to allow another psychologist to take over the client’s care." This means your notes need to tell a coherent story of assessment, formulation, and intervention.

From Vague to Defensible Note-Taking

Let’s get practical. It's time to shift from notes that just list what you did, to notes that explain why you did it. The goal is to clearly show how you’re weaving together all three EBP pillars: research, your expertise, and your client’s needs.

Take this all-too-common, vague note:

• Before: "Client reported high anxiety. Used CBT techniques. Psychoeducation provided. Scheduled next session."

This is a record of events, sure. But it doesn't show your clinical thinking. It’s a huge missed opportunity to demonstrate your commitment to evidence-based practice in psychology.

Now, let's evolve it into a note that would satisfy both a supervisor and an auditor:

• After: "Client presented with symptoms consistent with social anxiety, reporting intense fear of judgment in work meetings. Based on current systematic reviews favouring exposure-based interventions for social anxiety (Pillar 1: Research), we collaboratively developed an in-session behavioural experiment (Pillar 2: Clinical Expertise). The client agreed to try initiating one comment in a low-stakes team huddle this week, a goal they identified as challenging but achievable (Pillar 3: Client Values). Monitored SUDS throughout."

See the difference? This "after" version is powerful. It names a likely presentation, links to the evidence base, describes a specific technique, and explicitly includes the client's voice in the plan. It connects your actions to all three pillars of EBP, creating a record that is not just compliant, but professionally robust.

A Practical Template for EBP-Informed Notes

To make this a repeatable habit, try thinking of your case notes as answering three core questions that mirror the EBP model. This structure helps ensure your documentation is always audit-ready.

Your EBP Documentation Checklist:

1. What does the evidence say? Briefly mention the research base guiding your approach. You don't need a full literature review, just a nod to the established practice.
   • Example: "Intervention informed by ACT principles for chronic pain..."
2. How did I apply it? Describe the specific technique or strategy you used and how you adapted it for this client. This is where your clinical expertise shines.
   • Example: "...by using the 'passengers on the bus' metaphor to externalise difficult sensations."
3. How was the client involved? Note the client's response, agreement, or contribution to the plan. This is your evidence of shared decision-making.
   • Example: "Client found the metaphor helpful and identified a willingness to practice noticing sensations without struggle as a new goal."

Integrating these three elements into every note turns a chore into a professional practice asset. It builds a powerful body of evidence demonstrating your competence and adherence to professional standards, giving you peace of mind long before an audit is ever announced.

This structured approach is also gold for supervision. When you present your work this way, it focuses the conversation with your supervisor on deep clinical reasoning, not just recounting session events. If you're looking for ways to get more out of these conversations, you might find our article on tools for psychology supervisors helpful.

By documenting your EBP process clearly, you build a foundation of defensible, high-quality practice at every stage of your career.

Your EBP Checklist for Clinical Practice

Theory is one thing, but actually using it in the middle of a packed day is something else entirely. How do you make sure the principles of evidence-based practice don’t get lost between back-to-back clients and that mountain of paperwork?

Let’s make this immediately useful. Below is a practical checklist you can start using today. It’s a simple guide to embedding an EBP workflow into your clinical reasoning for any and every case. You’ll see it’s structured around the three core pillars, prompting you to actively consider each one.

This isn't about adding another annoying admin task to your day. Think of it as a habit-forming tool designed to make your existing clinical reasoning more explicit, structured, and defensible. You can save this on your desktop, print it out, or even build the questions straight into your session note templates.

The Three-Pillar Case Checklist

Run through these questions before, during, and after sessions to guide your formulation and treatment planning. They provide a clear structure for applying evidence-based practice in psychology to every client you see.

Pillar 1: What Does the Research Say?

• Question: What does the best available research evidence suggest for this client's presentation (e.g., social anxiety, complex trauma, adjustment disorder)?
• Action: Have I actually checked for a recent systematic review or clinical practice guideline? Think sources like the APS or the Cochrane Library.
• Documentation Prompt: “Formulation is guided by evidence for [Intervention Type] in treating [Client’s Condition]…”

Pillar 2: How Does My Expertise Inform This?

• Question: How does my clinical experience and judgment change how I should apply this evidence to this unique individual sitting in front of me?
• Action: What adaptations are necessary based on their history, comorbidities, strengths, and the therapeutic relationship we’ve built? Am I pacing this intervention correctly for them?
• Documentation Prompt: “...adapted the [Specific Technique] by [Your Action, e.g., slowing the pace of exposure] to suit the client’s current distress tolerance…”

Pillar 3: How Have I Integrated the Client's Voice?

• Question: How have I incorporated this client’s goals, values, and cultural context into the treatment plan we’ve developed?
• Action: Have we genuinely discussed the treatment options together? Does the client understand the why behind our approach and agree that it aligns with what they want to achieve?
• Documentation Prompt: “...in line with their stated goal of [Client’s Goal in their own words]. The client consented to this approach, confirming it feels like a good fit for them.”

By running through these simple questions, you create a powerful feedback loop. You’re consciously checking your decisions against the three pillars and, at the same time, creating the building blocks for a clear, audit-ready session note.

This simple checklist helps turn the abstract concept of EBP into a concrete, repeatable action. It builds the muscle memory needed to think, act, and document in a way that is robust, client-centred, and professionally sound. It gives you confidence that your excellent clinical work is also excellently documented.

Common Questions (and Scepticism) About EBP

Even with a clear road map, a few common and completely valid questions tend to pop up when it's time to put evidence-based practice into action. Let's tackle some of the most frequent queries and points of scepticism that come up in supervision and peer consultation groups.

What If There’s No Research for My Client's Specific Problem?

This is a big one, and it's an important concern. The good news is that EBP doesn't demand a perfect randomised controlled trial for every single client presentation. That would be impossible.

When you find that specific, high-level evidence is thin on the ground, the model simply asks you to be transparent and move to the next best source of information.

This might mean:

• Looking at research on related problems or populations.
• Drawing from well-established theoretical principles (like learning theory or attachment theory).
• Leaning more heavily on the other two pillars: your documented clinical expertise and a collaborative process with your client.

The key is to document your clinical reasoning. Make a note that you searched for specific evidence, found it limited, and therefore based your approach on [related principles/clinical consensus], which you will monitor closely with the client. Transparency is your best defence.

Isn’t EBP Just a Cookbook Approach That Ignores the Therapeutic Relationship?

This is probably the most significant myth about evidence-based practice in psychology. A true EBP approach doesn't ignore the therapeutic relationship; it explicitly places it inside the "clinical expertise" pillar. Your ability to build rapport, show genuine empathy, and adapt your communication style is a core clinical skill—one that research itself shows is vital for positive outcomes.

What's more, the third pillar—client values, preferences, and characteristics—is impossible to address without a strong therapeutic alliance. You can't understand or integrate what's important to your client without that connection. EBP isn't about rigidly applying a manual. It's about using evidence as a starting point and then skillfully adapting it based on your clinical judgement and your deep understanding of the unique person sitting in front of you.

How Can I Possibly Keep Up with New Research on a Full Caseload?

Trying to read everything is a recipe for burnout, and the model absolutely doesn't expect you to. The trick is to shift from "just-in-case" reading to "just-in-time" learning. Instead of trying to know everything, focus on building an efficient system.

1. Subscribe to trusted summaries: Find a few high-quality summary services or newsletters in your specific practice area and let them do the heavy lifting for you.
2. Use your peers: Make sharing key findings a regular agenda item in your peer consultation group. Everyone benefits from the collective effort.
3. Search smart, not hard: When a new or complex presentation comes up, budget a small amount of dedicated time (say, 30 minutes) to find a recent systematic review or clinical practice guideline. These synthesise years of research for you.

The goal is targeted, efficient inquiry, not encyclopaedic knowledge. This strategic approach makes staying current a manageable and sustainable part of your professional routine.

---

PracticeReady helps you capture EBP documentation that is structured, defensible, and audit-ready from day one.